ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Westmoreland's casino bet XI

| Saturday, Dec. 2, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

I have sent two emails to Jeannette officials asking if they had intentions of bidding on a satellite casino and have yet to hear a response.

I absolutely think Jeannette should place a bid. The city has very little business left and the tax revenue created by a casino would be an incredible boost to the economy.

But I have a feeling the people in charge will let this opportunity pass and we will have to watch a community like Greensburg or Irwin jump on this chance while we do nothing. We have plenty of space that could be basically given to a casino. There are at least two or three vacant sites where glass factories used to stand. I don't know that the city owns that property but I'm sure it owns some undeveloped property.

Some people will say a casino would attract crime and a lower class of citizen. Have you been to Jeannette lately? I grew up in this city, moved away for 25 years and came back five years ago, and it is unrecognizable to me. My taxes are high because there are very few people to pay taxes.

It seems like the only business left is the Elliott Co. If you build a casino other businesses will build around it and so on and so on.

Dale Parker


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me