ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Let's look at how we got here

| Sunday, Jan. 21, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

To paraphrase Bogie in “Casablanca”: The myriad problems of a chaotic and dystopian White House revealed by Michael Wolff in his book “Fire and Fury” don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy, mixed-up universe of 10 trillion galaxies.

Wolff's book merely recapitulates what has been obvious to close political observers during Donald Trump's first year in office. The shameful Trump family vaudeville act has a run of three more years. But what's that in a cosmos that's 13.5 billion years old?

What is important is to try to figure out how we got to this point. Maybe then we can redirect the passage of our humble planet on a more felicitous course.

Unless you're a real close-minded Trump cement head, try reading best-selling conservative author Charles J. Sykes' book “How the Right Lost Its Mind.” Even if you're a wild progressive, you will come to appreciate how intelligent, articulate and responsible some conservatives like Sykes can be. He joins George F. Will, William Kristol, Michael Steele and others who share the shame of those 65 percent of Americans who judge Trump as representative of our crudest and basest self.

While Wolff's book may engender a high degree of schadenfreude in the Never Trumpers, Sykes' book offers to the more moderate and sensible rightist some fresh viewpoints and commentaries on topics such as: “Why are so many people willing to believe fake news,” “Why the worst get on top,” “Limbaugh's flop” and the evangelical landslide.

You'll like Sykes. Believe me. Here's lookin' at you, kid.

Robert Jedrzejewski

Tarentum

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me