ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Mine will cost residents

| Sunday, Feb. 4, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

Our home, along with 600-plus other properties, is located in the footprint of LCT Energy's Rustic Ridge No. 1 deep mine. As a taxpayer, I feel that an inordinate financial burden is being placed on the residents in the area.

Significant devaluation of property values is a reality. If private water sources from wells and springs are lost, property is worthless. The dirt, noise, truck traffic and road deterioration from the mine operation will undoubtedly devalue property, and then there is the cost of mine subsidence insurance. Realtors have said a 40-percent devaluation is realistic.

The truck traffic every four to six minutes from the mine to Route 31 through Mt. Pleasant will negatively impact businesses.

Mountain Watershed Association alone has already spent $8 million to remediate streams from previous mine damage. History indicates that the probability of pollution to Indian Creek, a tributary of the Youghiogheny River, is high. This will impact the tourism industry — our No. 1 source of revenue — resulting in a loss of jobs.

The mine is short-term. Damage to water and property values is irreversible.

Jim Miller

Donegal Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me