ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Affection better ammunition for teachers

| Wednesday, March 7, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

Over the years, I've had a lot of wonderful teachers. But there is one I remember most fondly.

Miss Ferrari, my second-grade teacher, had shiny jet-black hair and pale skin with rose-tinted cheeks. She wore lavender shirtwaists with a frilly handkerchief in her breast pocket. She was beautiful.

And she smelled like talcum powder. I know this because every school day, before we walked home, we lined up to receive a hug and a kiss.

For some of us, it may have been the only kiss we got that day. For every one of us, it was the perfect cap to the day. We felt loved and special.

More than 50 years later, I remember her hug and kiss.

Today, Miss Ferrari would likely be expelled for her actions. Today, teachers must keep their affection to themselves. Even when a young child cries, teachers have learned to be leery of offering a simple hug.

Now, there's talk of arming teachers with guns.

But maybe there's something more powerful in their arsenal. Maybe if every child got the kind of warmth and affection Miss Ferrari offered, if every child from an early age knew that he or she was loved by someone who matters, maybe there would be less need for safety drills, scanners and fear.

Maybe there would be less heart-breaking carnage?

It's a simple thought. But love, we all know, can be a powerful weapon.

Leslie J. Miller

Squirrel Hill

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me