ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Cyber learning as financial strategy?

| Friday, March 23, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

What's the value of a cyber charter school? It depends on whom you ask.

Parents and caregivers at Commonwealth Charter Academy value the respect we have for their opinions and the education we offer their children, including a flexible schedule, family involvement and personalized learning. If you ask school districts, the answer is usually around $15,000. That's the average amount a Pennsylvania district spends to educate a student. Districts publicize that financial loss to combat the existence of cyber charter schools. Many view a child whose family exercises school choice as only a lost-dollar calculation.

That priority is apparent in the article “ Western Pa.'s school districts set up own cyber academies to keep money, students in-house. ” I'm happy to hear school districts are offering cyber learning to students, but there's a clear difference between a quality, comprehensive cyber charter school and a curriculum-in-a-box program.

For the sake of Pennsylvania students, I hope school districts value the quality of a modern cyber education — regardless of which school is providing it — and are not just using this new approach as purely a financial strategy.

Maurice “Reese” Flurie

Harrisburg

The writer is CEO of Commonwealth Charter Academy.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me