ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Slow the rush toward curriculum changes in Fox Chapel

| Monday, March 12, 2018, 10:48 a.m.
Dorseyville Middle School
Dorseyville Middle School

The Fox Chapel Area School District administration has decided that middle school students need a lot more math and a lot less foreign language, music, gym and social studies. Despite the objections of parents and district residents who have have filled two school board meetings, called school board members, sent letters and emails, met with administrators and board members, and presented a petition signed by over 730 residents, the school board plans to vote March 12 to abdicate their oversight responsibilities and allow the superintendent to proceed with whatever he deems best.

Shockingly, board members have never discussed either the class size or budget implications of doubling the time children spend in math and increasing their time in science and computer science. They and the parents were only informed of the details of the administration's plans within the past month. This despite the fact that plans have been in the works for at least 18 months.

Parents are asking our elected school board representatives to pause, ask the hard questions and slow this mad dash to implement the curriculum for 2018-19. Class size and budget have not been considered. What is the rush?

Dana Kellerman

Fox Chapel

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me