ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Fawn school closing: Deja vu?

| Sunday, May 13, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

I just read the front-page story concerning rumors about closing Fawn Primary Center ( “Highlands superintendent says no school closings planned” ). Like Yogi Berra said, “It's deja vu all over again.”

In April 2010 the Highlands school board meeting was packed with parents of Heights Elementary students who had heard rumors that the district was going to close the school. Board President Debra Beale said the board had no intention of closing the building and cited state law indicating the need to hold public hearings before any building closure. Within the next two months, the district announced that students at Heights were being transferred to other buildings. They kept the building open by renting out one classroom. When they held public hearings in 2011 to close the school, the room was nearly empty.

Beale is once again board president. This year's assurance came from Superintendent Michael Bjalobok. If you attend the May 14 board meeting, someone should ask if the board intends to repeat the above procedure. It's expensive to keep a nearly empty building open just to rent out one classroom. But a year from now, the public hearing should be a no-brainer.

Seventeen years ago, Highlands spent over $4 million to build a new stadium. We were told by a board member, “If you build it they will come.” If the board is thinking of closing Fawn Primary Center, the enrollment is not there. I believe it's declined steadily for the past 17 years. The board member who gave us the above quote: Debra Beale.

Sam Huey


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me