ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Urge support of renewable energy bill

| Sunday, June 17, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

As global climate change continues to warm the earth, we are feeling the impacts here in Pennsylvania. We saw four Nor'easters in March, followed by below-average temperatures throughout April. In May we saw weeks of above-average temperatures. For many Pennsylvanians it feels like we went straight from winter to summer.

But this shift in seasons is just a symptom of the larger problem. If we don't take the steps necessary to tackle global warming, we're guaranteed to experience more extreme weather — and not just changing temperatures. In our region, a warmer climate also means that storms, no matter the season, will carry more precipitation, bringing more flooding in warmer months and heavier snowfalls in colder months.

Pennsylvania and the rest of the nation needs to stop burning fossil fuels that contribute to global warming and transition as quickly as possible to 100 percent clean, renewable energy. Fortunately, bipartisan legislation has been introduced at the state level that would transition Pennsylvania to 100 percent renewable energy by the year 2050.

Concerned residents who want to make sure we protect future generations from the dire effects of climate change should call state Rep. Adam Ravenstahl to ask him to co-sponsor this important legislation — House Bill 2132.

Kelly Flanigan


The writer is a global warming solutions associate with PennEnvironment (

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me