ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Lack of discipline to blame for shootings

| Monday, June 11, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

I agree with letter-writer James Chrisner ( “Society is lacking” ). He is correct in saying that the school shootings are the result of us, not weapons.

Not only is there a lack of moral values and ethics, but also a lack of discipline at home. When I was growing up, my parents took the time to teach my sister and I the difference between right and wrong. We lived on a farm and with all of the planting, weeding, hoeing, harvesting, and taking care of animals, we didn't have time to get into trouble. Today kids don't have any work to do. They come and go as they please, and most parents don't know where their kids are or what they are doing.

Today we are pushing kids to grow up too fast, which leads to emotional and mental problems. We expect kids to know what career path to take by the time they are 10 or 12 years old. Schools should also take a long hard look at the bullying problem that is the root of a lot of school shootings. It won't go away by itself.

No, it is not the guns. My dad bought me a Daisy Red Ryder air rifle when I was 7, and I was using his .22 rifle to target practice when I was 9. Many of my classmates were hunting with their dads when they were 12. We didn't go out to kill anyone.

School shootings were unheard of in the 1940s and '50s. The problem is the way kids are brought up.

Melan Junik

West Deer

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me