ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: US must show mercy to families

| Saturday, June 9, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

The intensity of my love for and protectiveness of my children is fierce. As a person of privilege, I was the mother who tapped every resource in order to learn how to raise safe, healthy, happy children, whom I endlessly enriched and nurtured. Yet, because of frightening circumstances beyond my control, there was a time when my children were part of the “child welfare system.”

I raged when I lost the power to make decisions about my children. I laid in bed, desperate heart pounding, wondering whether to forever disappear with my children, or trust an overburdened, under-resourced agency to protect something so vulnerable and precious. I meticulously measured every word I uttered to the authorities and experts, knowing any answer could result in unfathomable misery. I have screamed in public, begging for my children to be left whole.

I panic at stories of children separated from parents at concentration camps and slave auctions, by abduction, and from natural causes. I weep over scenes of frantic animals being reunited with lost babies. I relate as a mother, because I know the impact on the children.

The United States, of which I am deeply proud and grateful to be a citizen, must put an immediate end to the separation of families at our borders. We must never recreate the indefensible crimes of human history. This must be the priority.

I offer no solutions. I simply again find myself asking for, needing, mercy for the children. And the parents. Mercy.

Cheryl Moore

Squirrel Hill

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me