ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: 25th Amendment does not provide for impeachment

| Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

Certain Democratic U.S. senators are claiming they can remove President Donald Trump by virtue of the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. They cannot.

The 25th Amendment is not an impeachment procedure against the president. The amendment is to be used in the event the president declares himself as being unable to perform the duties and powers of the presidency due to existing health conditions.

Section 3 of the 25th Amendment states, “Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.”

Section 4 states: “Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office.”

There has not been any declaration by any notable physician that Trump is not mentally or physically able to discharge the duties of the presidency. The Democratic Party and certain Democratic senators are treading in dangerous waters in their coup attempt to overthrow a duly elected president.

Call your Pennsylvania Democratic senator, Bob Casey, and voice your objection today.

John Kostelac

White Oak

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me