ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Gas industry paying fair share

| Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

The Commonwealth Financing Authority recently announced grants for 123 projects across the state ( “Impact fee funds $2.4 million in projects in Allegheny, Westmoreland counties,” Sept. 19, TribLIVE). This is great news — and it’s important to remember that those grants, which support parks, trails, flood mitigation and other environmental programs, are funded through Pennsylvania’s unique tax on natural gas, called the impact fee (Act 13).

That’s right — revenues from Pennsylvania’s natural gas impact fee directly benefit communities across the commonwealth. These funds are not abstract figures, nor are they dollars lost in Harrisburg — they result in real, tangible improvements.

Per the Tribune- Review article, locally, Springdale was awarded $206,661 for development of a trail and kayak launch, Bellevue received $225,000 for its Borough Memorial Park Project, and Jeannette was granted over $400,000 for flood mitigation. These are just a handful of the many projects announced this year that are funded through the impact fee.

Levied on top of all the other business taxes assessed in the commonwealth, Pennsylvania’s natural gas tax has generated nearly $1.5 billion in new revenue since 2012. Unfortunately, Gov. Tom Wolf often claims the natural gas industry is not taxed or paying its “fair share.” The announcement of these projects proves just the opposite and demonstrates real dollars for community improvements trump political rhetoric any day.

Erica Clayton Wright


The writer is vice president of communications and membership for the Marcellus Shale Coalition ( ).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me