ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

U.S. embarrassed

| Monday, Dec. 10, 2012, 8:54 p.m.

On Dec. 4, the U.S. Senate rejected the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities that has already been ratified by 126 other countries, including China, Russia, Cuba, Syria and Iran! The treaty had strong support from Republicans and Democrats and every major disability and veterans organization and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

The U.S. signed the Convention in 2009, but Senate approval was needed for the signing to be official. This international disability rights treaty would not require any change to any United States law but would forbid discrimination against people with disabilities throughout the world. Other countries would have followed the lead of the United States and used the Americans with Disabilities Act as a model for their disability laws. The rest of the world would have looked up to the United States as leader on disability rights issues.

Unfortunately, that will not be the case. The United States has been embarrassed and people with disabilities and their families are extremely saddened that some misguided senators did not vote for a treaty that required nothing of our country but would have protected vulnerable children and adults with disabilities throughout the world.

We thank Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., for voting in support of this treaty and are extremely disappointed that Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., did not vote to uphold the United States' position as a world leader on disability issues and to protect vulnerable children and adults with disabilities.

Nancy Murray

South Side

The writer is president of The Arc of Greater Pittsburgh (

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me