ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Taking care of business

| Saturday, Aug. 3, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

“Mr. (Daryl) Metcalfe should worry about his own business,” Gov. Tom Corbett told the media on July 2. He was responding to my comments regarding his failure to complete the budget on time this year because he spent too much time on his other proposals before the Legislature. He also claimed the budget was “on time.”

The budget deadline is June 30 of each year. On July 1, I was still casting votes on budget-package bills. The Senate rejected a budget-related bill on July 3 and on July 15, we held a voting session to complete the budget process of 2013.

I agree with the governor on two of the three proposals he offered to the Legislature. We should get the state out of the liquor business by privatizing the state stores, and we should change the government pension systems to be more like private-sector retirement plans, which will protect taxpayers.

I disagree with Corbett's gas-tax proposal, which could increase pump prices by 28 cents per gallon. His proposal would also funnel hundreds of millions of dollars into mass transit, not roads and bridges.

I have served in the Legislature during four gubernatorial administrations. As a member of the legislative branch, I have a constitutional responsibility to work as a balance of power to the other two branches of our state government. I opposed Gov. Tom Ridge's use of tax dollars for stadiums. I opposed Gov. Ed Rendell's tax and fee increases. I oppose Corbett's gas-tax increase.

Gov. Corbett said I should worry about my own business. I have a message for Gov. Corbett: State government is my business, and I will continue my fight to protect the taxpayers.

Daryl Metcalfe

Cranberry

The writer is the Republican state representative of the 12th Legislative District, which includes southeastern Butler County.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me