ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Use tax incentives

| Sunday, Nov. 24, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

After reading the news story “Volunteer firefighter forces dwindle” (Nov. 10 and TribLIVE.com), a solution is quite evident in my eyes.

As a former firefighter, I know the time and commitment these men and women endure to provide a much-needed service to their communities. As the story indicated, the hours of training, the hours committed to fundraising to ensure viability, are quite time-consuming.

While alliances have been one of the ways that some fire companies have ensured their continuing existence, they also create voids in coverage. The question is: How do we solve the problems of recruitment? The existing firefighters have shown they are committed to their communities, but in this day and age, is that enough? Sadly, that answer is “no.”

The answer is to create incentives for these volunteers. Offering property tax or state tax relief would give many men and women the incentive to join their local fire companies. The more fire calls or fundraising events that they attend, the more the relief.

While I admit that having to offer these types of incentives is a reflection of the type of world we now find ourselves in, the state of the economy, the pressures of life as we know it demand that we look at different avenues to ensure these vital, lifesaving departments. If we don't do something, I can envision the time when certain government entities will call for paid, unionized fire companies, which of course will lead to higher taxes for everyone.

Richard Bell

Ligonier Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me