ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Slots & property taxes

| Sunday, March 9, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Regarding Richard Wukich's letter “Good use of slots money” : Thank you, Eric Heyl, for pointing out yet another fleecing of the taxpayers in your column “Heyl: Casino cash lines wrong pockets” . And as to Mr. Wukich's claim that “(m)ost of the state's cut of the revenue was for property tax relief,” I would just like to say I am still waiting for my cut.

I remember Gov. Rendell and company promising as much as a 30-percent reduction in our real estate taxes. Well, where is it? If most of the state's cut is resulting in that measly, insignificant “homestead exemption,” then gambling is obviously not as lucrative as we have been told.

It is time that our state legislators live up to their sales pitch and start using all gambling proceeds to reduce real estate taxes for homeowners. At least until we get to the 30 percent or so that was touted. Are there any honest legislators left in Harrisburg? How do they all sleep at night?

P.S.: Mr. Wukich, none of us serfs have time to think about the sheik of Dubai or the queen of England and their horses! We are too busy slaving away so that people like you can be subsidized!

Michael J. Kardell

Murrysville

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me