ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Hope for spinal cord injuries

| Thursday, Sept. 11, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

September is National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month and I hope this letter will increase the recognition of this devastating condition to your readers.

A spinal cord injury can result in complete muscle paralysis, loss of sensation and bladder function and numerous complications in daily living. Dealing with this prognosis can be overwhelming to many individuals who feel there is no chance to ever again live a normal life. There is no cure for this type of injury, as spinal cord cells do not regenerate or heal.

I have been living as a quadriplegic for 35 years after being involved in a sports accident as a teenager. It has always been my hope that research would find a way for a human spinal cord to heal and allow for the 1.25 million Americans living with a spinal cord injury to return to a normal life. Although I recognize that a cure will probably never come in my lifetime, I am optimistic that this condition can be reversed.

Sadly, every 48 minutes another person will become paralyzed. This is simply unacceptable.

Scientists are closer than ever to finding the cure. The FDA has approved the world's only Phase 1 Human Clinical Trial testing cellular therapy using Schwann cells on people with spinal cord injury. The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis is leading this groundbreaking research and has operated on its first patients. Once thought impossible, a cure for paralysis is on the horizon.

During this month, I hope people will recognize the struggles that those who are paralyzed confront on a daily basis and consider donating to organizations that will allow millions with spinal cord injuries to eventually live normal lives and walk again.

Brian Jacob

Lower Burrell

The writer is the president of WestArm Therapy Services, based in Lower Burrell.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me