ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Fair funding for schools

| Friday, Nov. 28, 2014, 8:57 p.m.

Pennsylvania is one of only three states without a consistently applied school funding formula, which creates unfairness for students and disparities among school districts across the state. State officials must find an equitable method to distribute state funds for public education so that all students can be better served and have access to high-quality educational programs and services.

Recently, more than 850 educators across Pennsylvania met via video conference at 29 locations on the same night to discuss the need for a fair public school funding formula. Discussions focused on how the Legislature determines the amount and method of basic education funding by using inconsistent criteria. The last true school funding formula, eliminated in 2011, calculated state aid based on a district's actual costs, which created a more level playing field and a state financial commitment for educating students.

The newly appointed Basic Education Funding Commission is working to create a new school funding formula that is fair, adequate and equitable for all school districts. A new formula must consider changing district demographics, such as population and income changes. Also, the equitable distribution of state funds must consider student poverty levels and district size to close the achievement gap for minority and low-income students so they can graduate ready for careers and/or college.

A fair, predictable and equitable school funding formula will provide Pennsylvania school districts the opportunities and resources to offer a high-quality education for all students regardless of where they live.

William H. Kerr

Apollo

The writer is Norwin School District's superintendent and the former superintendent of the Armstrong School District.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me