ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Wrongly silenced

| Monday, March 9, 2015, 9:00 p.m.

I am sad to say Delmont seems to be the laughingstock of Westmoreland County. In a town as small as Mayberry, we have a gag-order policy on three nonunion borough employees ( “Policy bars Delmont staff from talking about borough matters” ). Can Delmont Council say “freedom of speech”? I doubt they know what the First Amendment says.

We have been the butt of jokes, such as “Do we have covert operations going on?” Then we have those saying “Did Obama and Eric Holder take over the town?” This is way beyond ridiculous, it is insane.

To get information from our council president is almost impossible, since he misses a lot of meetings and his phone number is unlisted. Our mayor is not Bill Peduto of Pittsburgh. Her responsibilities pertain to the police force, reading the fire report and planning events such as community day. The only time she should be involved in council business is if there is a tie vote, which rarely happens.

The three employees have done nothing wrong. Council, on the other hand, has broken the sunshine laws and lied to the citizens about it more than once. Our own solicitor knew of an allegedly illegal meeting and did nothing about it; he in fact sanctioned it ( “Former Delmont official claims council violated Sunshine Act” ). So who needs to bear the threat of losing their jobs, the employees or our council and solicitor?

My vote goes to the latter. They are one body that votes 7-0 on just about everything — no questions asked. They are like sheep that follow an inept leader. ACLU, I hope you are reading this.

Julie Walczer


The writer is a former Delmont councilwoman.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me