ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Wolf's wrong

| Tuesday, March 10, 2015, 9:00 p.m.

Natural gas development in the commonwealth continues to be an absolute game changer for every one of our 67 counties, bringing positive progress and broad-based benefits to all Pennsylvanians. This is especially true on the job-creation and tax-revenue front as well as the opportunity for a regional manufacturing rebirth.

Yet Gov. Tom Wolf is offering higher energy taxes on an industry that already generates substantial tax revenue for state and local governments. This would undercut Pennsylvania's position in the global fight to attract capital investments and stunt this economic momentum.

Small businesses, labor unions and local governments across the state share our deep concerns about the economically damaging consequences associated with higher energy taxes and potential job losses. It's also clear that voters across the political spectrum overwhelmingly favor good-paying local jobs and expanding the natural gas industry's growth over higher energy taxes.

Now is the absolute wrong time for onerously higher energy taxes, which threaten jobs and Pennsylvania's long-term competitiveness.

Dave Spigelmyer

Robinson Township

The writer is the president of the Marcellus Shale Coalition.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me