ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

What GOP's doing in control II

| Wednesday, March 11, 2015, 9:00 p.m.

Now that the Republicans' post-midterm-election hug has passed and they are ensconced in Washington, it may be instructive to look back to recent times when they ran the big show.

Republicans pretty much owned the entire federal government from about mid-2002 to 2006, and in that post-9/11 world, the size of government ballooned, deficits exploded, two wars were overseen and mismanaged (recall Paul Bremer, no weapons of mass destruction, the disbanding of Saddam's army), the Katrina fiasco occurred — and I could go on.

Every economy needs a banking system to operate, and the party of business watched as a housing crisis morphed into a credit crisis, leaving a banking system on the brink. Of course, Wall Street wants to operate free of regulation until its asset-shifting card tricks spiral downward and, sure enough, its collective hand was out so the government it spurns could save it.

So now, in 2015, we will be guided by two great thinkers, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell, who start off by inviting another leader — one who, by the way, runs an open-air prison in Gaza — into our House chamber to tell us how to formulate policy. A sure sign of weakness.

Robert Daufenbach

McCandless

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me