ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Time for medical cannabis

| Friday, April 10, 2015, 8:57 p.m.

A new Quinnipiac University poll shows a staggering 88 percent of Pennsylvanians indicated clear support for a medicinal cannabis program.

State Sens. Mike Folmer (R-Lebanon) and Daylin Leach (D-Montgomery) have reintroduced medical cannabis legislation for people to obtain licenses to grow, process and dispense medicinal cannabis. Patients with a qualifying condition would be able to obtain a medicinal cannabis card upon the recommendation of their physician, provided they are suffering from one of the approved conditions set forth in the bill.

With this level of public support, one would assume medicinal cannabis would pass the Senate and House easily. A prior version of the bill passed the Senate in a 43-7 vote last year.

So why the delay?

Medical marijuana is available in 23 states. Veterans Affairs permits cannabis use in states that have medicinal programs.

Hundreds of controlled clinical studies of the medical efficacy of cannabis have demonstrated its incredible potential in controlling diabetes, relieving chronic pain and the side effects of chemotherapy and treating post-traumatic stress disorder.

The urgency is real for chronic pain sufferers, some of whom develop addictions to heroin and other opioids. There's a new study showing states with medicinal cannabis programs have 25 percent fewer prescription opioid deaths.

Every day, Pennsylvanians suffer while millions of Americans have access to medical marijuana. Sick Pennsylvanians cannot wait another day.

Patrick K. Nightingale


The author is the executive director of the Pittsburgh chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me