ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Carrier's commonwealth connections

| Thursday, Nov. 26, 2015, 8:55 p.m.

Western Pennsylvania is proud of its contributions to the next-generation aircraft carrier, Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78). As Craig Smith covered in “Export native to take helm of Navy's newest warship, USS Gerald Ford” when the ship is delivered to the U.S. Navy next year, a Western Pennsylvania native, Capt. John Meier, will be at the helm of this “game changer.”

But Western Pennsylvania's contributions don't end there.

When Ford enters the fleet, some of its parts and systems will have been designed and manufactured by our neighbors, friends, and family members here in Pennsylvania. My company, Global/SFC Valve Corp. in Somerset is one of the more than 100 companies in Pennsylvania that contribute to the construction and maintenance of aircraft carriers.

Western Pennsylvania supports those who serve our nation by helping to build the largest, most powerful, and most technologically advanced ship ever.

Ford will soon take its place in the nation's carrier fleet, where it will be the cornerstone of U.S. military supremacy around the globe. When it does, let's pause and recognize this ship's deep personal and manufacturing roots here in the Commonwealth.

Best wishes to Capt. Meier as he takes command of the USS Gerald R. Ford.

Bob Kirst


The writer is president of Global/SFC Valve Corporation.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me