ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Toomey's court position rankles

| Monday, Feb. 22, 2016, 9:00 p.m.

Just two hours after Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's death was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell issued a call to block any attempt by President Obama to choose Scalia's replacement.

Two days later, Sen. Pat Toomey joined his party in recommending that no decision on a nominee be made until the people speak by voting in November. But the people already spoke when they re-elected President Obama in 2012.

If Toomey hasn't been keeping track, Obama still has 11 months left to serve in his term. Further, Toomey jumping on the anti-nomination bandwagon makes us wonder about the sincerity of his comments made on the Senate floor just a few weeks ago when he said filling federal judicial vacancies has been a priority of his since he came to the Senate.

The president has said he will do his job and put forth a nominee. Senator, if you want us to believe you are able to rise above the gridlock and work in a bipartisan way when it comes to federal judicial nominations, do your job as well.

Christine Stone

Squirrel Hill

The writer is vice-chair of Why Courts Matter Pennsylvania

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me