ShareThis Page
Lori Falce: Julian Assange arrest not a press attack | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Lori Falce: Julian Assange arrest not a press attack

Lori Falce
1009513_web1_WORLD-NEWS-ECUADOR-ASSANGE-ZUM

You, Julian Assange, are not a journalist.

I know you like to claim that you are, largely because you like to hide behind the protections journalists are sometimes afforded when it comes to obtaining and releasing information and questioning authority.

But what you have done is not journalism. It has less to do with journalism than supermarket tabloids or cheesy news-style infotainment television shows do.

You gleefully throw Molotov cocktails filled with information and topped with a lit rag. You don’t care where the information was obtained. You don’t care about things like national security or the safety of soldiers or operatives in the field.

You are, first and foremost, a hacker. In many ways, you are still that kid your biography page talks about that broke into an Australian telecommunications system and got charged with 30 counts but wiggled away with just a fine. You’re the guy who went to college but dropped out because you were morally offended by what other students were doing for the government.

You are, in short, someone with a limitless supply of stones who is oblivious to the fact you are pitching them from inside your own glass house.

That doesn’t make you a journalist. Neither do awards. Neither does notoriety. Neither do the number of times people click on your site. A site where, incidentally, you are no longer editor-in-chief, according to The Times, because you could no longer get internet service inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London where you hid for years to avoid the consequences of your actions.

And there are consequences, because being a journalist is more than the publishing. It is the research and the evaluation, the news judgment and the editing. It is having the whole autopsy but not printing the pictures, and more importantly, knowing why.

An explosion of information can destroy as much as it reveals. Journalism should be the surgical release of relevant information, filtered by responsibility and ethics.

Journalists die for stories. They don’t hide in the halls of another government after they trade their citizenship. Journalists go to jail to protect sources, taking the responsibility on themselves to stand behind the words they produce. Journalists do what they believe they must, then sign their names and stand their ground.

I don’t know if you actually believe you are a journalist, or if it is a convenient defense, like temporary insanity or high blood sugar or the side effects of sleeping pills. I don’t know if you are lying to yourself when you claim our protections at a time when those protections are being ignored around the world with the same blissful blasé attitude you have toward the word “confidential.”

But I know that Edward Snowden is wrong when he says that your arrest — when Ecuador revoked your citizenship and London police executed an existing warrant — was a “dark moment for press freedom.” We have seen those. They happen. This isn’t one of them.

Because you, Julian Assange, are not the press.

Lori Falce is a Tribune-Review community engagement editor. You can contact Lori at [email protected].

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.