Lori Falce: Presidential debates are beauty pageants | TribLIVE.com
Lori Falce, Columnist

Lori Falce: Presidential debates are beauty pageants

Lori Falce

We are about to play the next round of everyone’s favorite game show, “Who Wants to Be President?”

And the answer in the Democratic Party continues to be the same. Everyone.

Yes, we are a year out from the 2020 convention, but it would be great if the CNN debates in Detroit on Tuesday and Wednesday could give us more candidates’ ideas rather than posturing and jockeying for position. The point isn’t the spectacle. It’s taking a deep bench of possibilities and winnowing it down. And that’s hard since so many of them sound alike.

The debates are a bit of a beauty pageant. And so far, they have been a little too Miss Universe when what we need is more Miss America 2.0 — a contest trying to retain its popularity while establishing itself as more about scholarships than walking in high heels.

Maybe the MSNBC/NBC/Telemundo version was a glitzy prime-time game show format that will change, but with CNN’s dramatic drawing of names for the different nights — which seemed akin to the announcement of the Emmy nominations — that seems unlikely.

So if we’re headed for a pageant, let’s take a piece of that time-honored format that could really be beneficial. No, we don’t need to see Bernie Sanders in swimwear or Marianne Williamson doing interpretive dance. A political campaign is already a lot of walking while waving, so they have that part down.

Let’s get to the isolation booth.

You know, the glass box where the contestants — or rather, candidates — wait to come out one by one to answer the same question.

They all get the same chance. They answer on their own terms. They don’t answer by getting off topic about what someone else said. There’s no glancing around to see who else is raising a hand.

If it’s good enough for Miss Mississippi and Miss Texas to focus on answers about world peace, I think it can work for senators and governors talking about immigration and health care.

Maybe some think we need the spectacle of 20 people arguing and springing gotcha moments on each other to energize interest, but I think there is room to appeal to people on more than a WWE level. For seven weeks, America sat down together to watch James Holzhauer systematically march through 33 episodes of “Jeopardy!” We didn’t know all the answers, but we enjoyed seeing someone show that he did.

So let’s move this along with real questions, real answers and a way to cut down to a manageable group of semifinalists. Because that’s when we win the prize: a real debate.

Lori Falce is a Tribune-Review community engagement editor. You can contact Lori at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.