Lori Falce: Trump, Dems can’t just preach to choir | TribLIVE.com
Lori Falce, Columnist

Lori Falce: Trump, Dems can’t just preach to choir

Lori Falce
1259599_web1_1145318135
Drew Angerer | Getty Images
The crowd looks on as President Trump speaks during a “Make America Great Again” campaign rally at Williamsport Regional Airport on May 20 in Montoursville, Pa.

I learned the best lesson about politics from a missionary.

I was covering a church event. The missionary had come to town to promote a book. It didn’t go well, and she pegged me early on as someone who wasn’t there because I identified with her message. Maybe the notebook gave me away.

Three long hours later, determined to salvage something, I waited to get a comment. What I got was a cold look and a colder response.

“I do not talk to nonbelievers.”

My first thought was that she needed to brush up on the job description for “missionary.” My second thought was that this was no way to sell a book.

I have the same thought about President Trump and some of the contenders for the 2020 Democratic nomination.

The president is wildly popular among the people who are already in his camp, with approval numbers that are rock solid in those strongholds. Outside those areas, they are much lower, and some wonder if just staying with his base is enough to win a second term.

In the ever-expanding ranks of those running for president on the left, you have a number who are turning their backs on those same voters and their favored broadcast source, Fox News.

Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris have opposed the idea of participating in the channel’s moderated town halls while embracing appearances on MSNBC and CNN. The Democratic National Committee has declined an offer from Fox News to host one of the primary debates, which include 12 clashes and are set to start June 26.

Now, admittedly, Trump gets good optics from his rallies speaking to enthusiastic supporters, but they do nothing to win anyone else over. Warren and Harris get kudos for standing their ground and simultaneously not giving Fox a chance to make money off of beating them up, but they also give the network an opportunity to crow about how they aren’t talking to a chunk of the electorate.

The ones who are talking outside the echo chamber are making headlines, for good or ill. Sen. Bernie Sanders did one and got cheers from a Fox audience in Pennsylvania talking about his “Medicare for All” idea. South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg got applause for telling another Fox crowd that he didn’t care about Trump’s tweets.

This week, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand challenged some of the network’s presentation of abortion discussion. Chris Wallace said it wasn’t “very polite.” She’s raising money off that sound byte by selling merchandise on her website.

In any situation, it takes more than the people who agree with you to get things done, and Washington’s intrinsic failure to recognize that is what is leading to wider and deeper divides, less bipartisan cooperation and fewer accomplishments.

Preaching to the choir will get a missionary a lot of “amens,” but it doesn’t save any souls. Or sell those books.

Lori Falce is a Tribune-Review community engagement editor. You can contact Lori at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.