Lori Falce: What can Brown v. Board of Education do for you? | TribLIVE.com
Lori Falce, Columnist

Lori Falce: What can Brown v. Board of Education do for you?

Lori Falce
1156542_web1_ClassroomSeats

It’s a question that has been asked of many judicial nominees in recent years.

“Is Brown v. the Board of Education settled law?”

More surprising than the question is the lack of answer. Lately, what has always been a softball is being bounced on the fingertips like a hot potato.

This is the 65th anniversary of “Brown,” one the great power lines of the U.S. Supreme Court. It was the case where the justices set in stone what Thomas Jefferson had set in ink — that everyone is equal. It pulled the teeth from a previous ruling, Plessy v. Ferguson, that gave permission to every Jim Crow double standard.

Brown said no. Brown said separate but equal will never work because it will never be equal. Brown shook its head and demanded that if white kids get to go to the big school with new textbooks and up-to-date facilities, the black kids are going to be sitting next to them.

But what does that matter now? Almost a lifetime later, what does that matter to me? To you? To our lives today?

It means everything.

The case was about a family that wanted to have their daughter go to a school near their home, despite the fact that she was black and the school was for whites. But the decision? That was for every American.

Equality isn’t something that is given on a case-by-case basis. We either have it or we don’t. Brown didn’t just say that black kids are equal to white kids. It said all kids are equal to each other. It said that women are equal to men, that Christians are equal to Jews, that gay is equal to straight, that disabled is equal to able.

If American law was the Bible, Brown would be the first chapter of the New Testament. It looked at what went before, drew a line and declared that going forward, things would be different.

And it was. Even if it isn’t cited as precedent in so much of what came after, it affected a shift. Like the presumption of innocence in criminal court, Brown spelled out a presumption of non-discrimination. We might still be looking for that perfect equity, but Brown gave us a treasure map promising that it is out there somewhere.

Civil Rights Act. Voting Rights Act. Individuals with Disabilities Act. Fair Housing Act. So many more. They start with the idea that America is a classroom with a desk for everyone.

So why the hedging when asked about it now?

Despite Chief Justice John Roberts, justices Sam Alito and Neil Gorsuch and others saying it was settled law until 2017, other nominees since are giving the same kind of non-answer answers that come for questions about abortion and capital punishment — topics that will almost certainly come up in cases and preserve the judge’s veil of impartiality.

But there should be nothing about recognizing the validity of Brown that threatens impartiality.

Just like there should be nothing about recognizing the Declaration of Independence.

Our nation was born with the announcement that all of us were created equal.

Lori Falce is a Tribune-Review community engagement editor. You can contact Lori at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.