Michelle Malkin: Exoneree, now a law grad, fights for justice | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

Michelle Malkin: Exoneree, now a law grad, fights for justice

Michelle Malkin
1253422_web1_gtr-cmns-Malkin-061019

What would you do if you were falsely accused and convicted of a brutal rape and murder you didn’t commit?

How would you handle a violent maximum-security prison, sentenced to 16 years to life, at age 17?

And where would you go, what would you choose to do, if you won your freedom back after full exoneration?

Jeffrey Deskovic, 45, graduated from Pace University School of Law last month to rousing cheers from friends, family and faculty. On its own, the achievement warrants celebration. Any graduation does. His feat is just one of an extraordinary set of milestones in the extraordinary life of an extraordinary man.

In November 1989, Deskovic’s Peekskill, N.Y., high school classmate, 15-year-old Angela Correa, was raped, beaten and strangled to death. Detectives decided that Deskovic, who did not know Correa, had acted excessively upset at Correa’s memorials. Police succumbed to tunnel vision and confirmation bias, misinterpreting Deskovic’s amateur passion to help solve the crime as a sign of guilt. After speaking with him multiple times, steadily feeding him information about the case, they brought Deskovic in for a polygraph.

The teen who had never been in trouble with the law was interrogated for more than seven hours without a lawyer, family member or food. Detectives bullied, cajoled and lied to him about failing the testing. It’s a classic recipe for a false confession and undue process. The coercive interrogation ended with Deskovic in a fetal position under the polygraph table.

Despondent, Deskovic attempted suicide twice before trial.

In January 1991, he was “convicted by jury of 1st degree rape and 2nd degree murder, despite DNA results showing that he was not the source of semen in the victim’s rape kit.” Deskovic told Westchester Magazine: “It just didn’t seem real. It was like I was observing it from the outside. I felt I was in Fantasyland.”

Maintaining his innocence from the start, t he sensitive high schooler who grew up behind bars earned an associate degree and appealed to anyone on the outside who would listen. After multiple rejections, the Innocence Project took up his case and won postconviction DNA testing that identified the real rapist and killer: a man named Stephen Cunningham.

In 2006, Deskovic was freed and won a judicial determination of actual innocence. He received an apology from an assistant district attorney, along with multimillion- dollar civil suit awards from New York state, Westchester County, Peekskill and Putnam County.

Transitioning to life as a free man was not easy, but Deskovic has not wasted a single moment of it as an exoneree.

On a whirlwind quest to prevent and undo miscarriages of justice like the one he suffered, he earned bachelor’s and master’s degrees and now a law degree (making the dean’s list the last four semesters of a hectic year).

While in law school, he traveled to Armenia and Argentina to give wrongful conviction presentations, played an instrumental role in prosecutorial misconduct reform in New York state, gave dozens of radio, TV and documentary interviews started the Deskovic Foundation for Justice (which has helped exonerate seven people), and taught multiple classes on criminal justice to judges and police academies.

It’s Deskovic’s unique willingness to reach out to law enforcement and enlighten them, instead of to demonize them, that makes him an invaluable leader in criminal justice reform. Lt. Michael Devine of the Bergen County Law and Public Safety Institute was so impressed with Deskovic’s presentations to corrections recruits that he successfully requested that the exoneree become a certified instructor for the New Jersey Police Training Commission.

Deskovic will take the bar exam in eight weeks. His foundation just helped win retrial scheduled in September for Andrew Krivak, a man wrongfully convicted of the rape and murder of a 12-year-old girl in Putnam County, N.Y. in 1997. No physical evidence connected Krivak or his co-defendant Anthony DiPippo to the victim or the crime scene. The prosecution relied on a fake polygraph exam administered by the same official involved in Deskovic’s wrongful conviction. (I told you Hollywood couldn’t make this up!)

DiPippo, exonerated in 2016 after three trials and 20 years in prison, attended Deskovic’s graduation with hundreds of others. He hailed his friend as “the future of the grass-roots innocence movement.”

I agree, which is why I have lent my time, heart, and financial support to the Deskovic Foundation and hope you will, too.

You can find out more about this tireless human being at www.deskovic foundation.org.

Michelle Malkin is a conservative blogger, syndicated columnist, author and Fox News Channel contributor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.