ShareThis Page
Paul Kengor: Join the Twitter mob! |
Paul Kengor, Columnist

Paul Kengor: Join the Twitter mob!

Paul Kengor
A Jan. 18 image made from video provided by the Survival Media Agency shows Covington Catholic High School teenagers at the March for Life in Washington.

“You’ve got to get on Twitter!” a former student told me recently. “It’s where everything is happening.”

Well, I’m not on Twitter. I do, however, have a Twitter account. I don’t know what it is, where it is or how to access it. I want nothing to do with it.

Why, then, do I have a Twitter account? Because a publicist for one of my books insisted.

“I’m creating a Twitter account for you,” she cheerfully announced.

“No,” I replied.

“Yes,” she responded.

“Hell, no,” I retorted.

“Oh, come on,” was her response. “You’ll love it!”

I explained that I already get 300-400 emails per day that I can’t respond to. To “do” Twitter every day, hour, minute, I would need a microchip surgically implanted in my brain. Sure, just run a cord from my phone into my right ear, and let the blinking and twitching begin.

“Why this addiction to every new technology?” I pleaded to my publicist, brandishing my Luddite predilections. “Can’t we just say ‘no’ sometimes?”

My publicist explained that Twitter is great for promoting a book, which is undeniably true. Still, I’d rather not sell my soul for a few pieces of silver.

The whole thing reared its head again a few weeks ago. I was at a studio to record Mark Levin’s TV show. The engineer called me over to review the taglines they planned to display for me on the screen. One of them listed my Twitter name.

“Whoa,” I told him. “Delete that. I don’t use that.”

“You don’t use your own Twitter account?” he responded incredulously.

“Nope,” I informed him. “I don’t look at it.”

I said to the engineer what I want to say emphatically here: The thing I hate most about Twitter is the mob mentality. It’s the closest we get in 21st-century America to a frenzied mob of Jacobin rabble in 18th-century Paris storming the streets looking for someone’s scalp. It feeds kneejerk-ism. It thrives on and foments emotionality. It’s like a thousand children in a packed room shouting petulant insults, with no one taking the time to step back, cool down and wait another day for more information and a more sober and thoughtful response.

Someone says something about someone at noon — who knows whether it’s accurate — and by 2 p.m. a lynch mob is gathering for the poor sucker, who by 3 p.m. is begging for mercy. My advice to the sorry sack: Ignore it. No one will remember by the next day at noon. You’ll be old news — boooooring. No longer trending! The mob will move to the next victim it’s ginned up about.

The latest example is the incident that occurred with a group of boys from Covington (Ky.) Catholic High School. They were quickly accused of mocking a Native American man. The incident went viral, with a gazillion judge-and-jury experts chiming in with snap verdicts.

“Off with their heads!” shouted the mob. Until, that is, more video appeared and revealed other sides to the story.

It was classic. It’s what happens every day with this ridiculous technology that makes us worse, not better.

Oh, and if you disagree, just send me a “tweet.” I won’t see it, but others will surely surface to engage in a nasty argument with you. Cheers!

Paul Kengor is professor of political science and executive director of The Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College. His column appears twice a month.

Paul Kengor is a professor of political science and executive director of the Institute for Faith & Freedom at Grove City College.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.