Robert Torres: Older Pennsylvanians need more than minimum wage | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

Robert Torres: Older Pennsylvanians need more than minimum wage

1287558_web1_gtr-cmns-Torres-061719

It’s personal to us at the Department of Aging that more than 18% of workers earning less than $15 per hour are age 55 or older. That means 374,000 older adults are not making a living wage as they try to afford food and housing, on top of those facing or anticipating aging-related health care costs. Many seniors also serve as the primary caregiver of their grandchildren, trying to raise kids on a limited income.

We need to raise the minimum wage so our older Pennsylvanians get paid enough to live.

Gov. Tom Wolf has been steadfast in his pursuit of raising Pennsylvania’s minimum wage to $12 an hour by July 1, and to $15 an hour by 2025. This proposal is supported by 38 Pennsylvania economists and has been introduced in both the Pennsylvania House and Senate.

Raising the minimum wage has become increasingly crucial to aging Pennsylvanians, especially as Americans continue to live and work longer. According to the United States Department of Labor, workers age 55 and older are the fastest growing labor group in the U.S. They anticipate that by 2024, 1 in 4 people in the labor force will be at least 55.

Unfortunately, many older adults find themselves taking minimum-wage positions after re-entering the workforce from retirement because higher-paying jobs may have educational requirements unrealistic for them or, worse, they are denied a better-paying position because of their age.

Regardless of how they found themselves in a minimum-wage job, our older Pennsylvanians deserve an income that reflects their hard work and allows them a lifestyle where they can financially contribute to their community. Many find themselves having to take advantage of public assistance because their minimum-wage pay cannot realistically support them. Older adults want to work and be independent, but low wages often leave them with little choice.

A minimum-wage increase also will benefit older adults who find themselves in long-term care settings. Pennsylvania is facing an escalating crisis with its direct care workforce. It’s a job path that is rewarding but demanding, with a constant shortage of workers, extremely high turnover and generally low pay. Many will jump at an opportunity for even a few cents more, and who can blame them? This results in seniors losing a beloved caregiver, the person they trusted with some of their most personal and intimate needs, for an often less-experienced newcomer. Or, the long-term care facility has to turn away older adults in need because they can’t retain staff. Consistency goes with quality, and Pennsylvania seniors cannot be guaranteed quality care if the direct care workforce is not fairly or adequately compensated.

We know older adults and seniors want to age in place. They want to remain in their communities working and engaging with friends and family. Without a fair wage, they can’t be truly independent.

Right now, nearly 220,000 hourly wage individuals age 55 and older are earning anywhere from below the minimum wage to $12 an hour. Those are our aging parents, grandparents, neighbors and friends, and they deserve pay that gives them self-sufficiency. It’s what they want and deserve.

It’s time for Pennsylvania to catch up with 29 other states, including our neighboring states, and give all Pennsylvanians a fair, living wage.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.