S.E. Cupp: Big government was winner at Dem debate | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

S.E. Cupp: Big government was winner at Dem debate

S.E. Cupp
Former Vice President Joe Biden, left, Sen. Elizabeth Warren and South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg speak during the Democratic presidential primary debate at Otterbein University Oct. 15 in Westerville, Ohio.

At the first Democratic primary debate since the American political landscape tectonically shifted, it’s no surprise the potential impeachment of President Trump was a significant focus of the night.

How, why and when Trump should be impeached drew creative and passionate responses from the people vying for his job.

It was one of many agenda items that united the Democrats Tuesday night at the CNN/New York Times debate in Ohio, despite some discrete skirmishes around the edges over how much of our health care should be free — 100% or 99% — and whether giving up your gun should be voluntary or mandatory.

But in addition to impeachment, another issue united the 12 candidates on stage: just how much they want to insert themselves into our daily lives.

It’s no surprise liberals believe government should be a prominent fixture in your life, far more so than conservatives. But even for them, many moments in the debate felt downright Orwellian.

Consider the conversation around tech, an industry that touches us all in various and impactful ways. While many candidates hammered Silicon Valley for, in their view, harboring dangerous monopolies and enabling election meddlers, they also took shots at our favorite apps and websites.

Democratic candidates mentioned Facebook, Twitter, Uber, Amazon, Bing and Microsoft, and not positively — an interesting play considering how many people, not just millennials, use and depend on many of these applications and sites every day.

In her crusade to trample on free speech, Kamala Harris tried desperately to enlist a co-conspirator in Elizabeth Warren, goading her into co-signing her plan to kick Trump off Twitter, an idea that’s both foolhardy and transparently illiberal. Warren didn’t take the bait, but not for Harris’ lack of insistence.

Andrew Yang, who comes from the world of corporate tech himself, declared that screen time for kids was a major societal problem — and apparently one he thinks the president of the United States should solve, inserting himself into our homes and onto our phones. Interestingly, Yang can point to Republican lawmaker Josh Hawley, who’s proposed actual legislation meant to intercept your social media use.

There were other creative suggestions by the Democrats to invigorate the presidency with omnipotence and omnipresence.

Harris promised that if Congress — the people we elect to make our laws — didn’t pass the gun ban she’s calling for within the first 100 days of her presidency, she would use her executive authority to do it.

Beto O’Rourke confessed his gun buyback plan wouldn’t include going door to door, but that he’d expect Americans to “do the right thing,” which I suppose is what he wants them to.

Nowhere was the intrusion into private life more obvious than in health care, where Warren and Bernie Sanders vied to be the most obtrusive candidates on the stage, arguing with other candidates over whether the government should fully or mostly hijack our health insurance decisions.

At least one voice of reason, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who wants to let people buy into Medicare, not be forced onto it, pointed out, “I don’t think the American people are wrong when they say what they want is a choice.” Likewise, Amy Klobuchar tried to reason with Warren, asserting that hers weren’t the only solutions to combat rising health care costs.

O’Rourke correctly noted that Warren’s policies can come off as too punitive, because they are. These notions fell on deaf ears.

There were a few good lines Tuesday night, a couple of memorable moments. If anyone changed the primary landscape, it was only incrementally. The biggest loser of the night, though, was our personal freedom, which Democrats seemed determined to override in favor of their personal favorite solutions.

S.E. Cupp is the host of “S.E. Cupp Unfiltered” on CNN.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.