S.E. Cupp: Senate vote could offer up some surprises | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

S.E. Cupp: Senate vote could offer up some surprises

S.E. Cupp
1950179_web1_1941803-33c881697c994b27ab0f8e4e4ee4fdca
AP
Ranking member Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and Steve Castor, Republican staff legal counsel of the House Oversight Committee, talk during testimony Nov. 13 during the first public impeachment hearing.

At a time when politics has become less and less about governing and increasingly, well, about politics, last week is perhaps the penultimate illustration.

Last week the testimony began in President Trump’s impeachment inquiry, and the nation is watching as members of Congress from both sides of the aisle perform for the cameras and their bases — think a little William Jennings Bryan, a little Perry Mason and a lot of “Veep.”

Impeachment is, above all else, a political act. It’s not a legal one. If Democrats vote to impeach the president, he still gets to be president.

And, with the Senate needing no fewer than 20 Republicans to decide to remove him, Trump will likely remain in office and carry on his re-election bid, maybe even strengthened by the whole endeavor.

Considering the political realities, it can feel like we already know how this movie will end: matter-of-factly and anticlimactically. And yet, it isn’t outside the realm of possibilities that a Capraesque finish waits in the wings.

While former Sen. Jeff Flake, a casualty of the GOP Trump takeover, warned there could be as many as 35 Republicans in the Senate who would agree to remove Trump from office if the vote were silent, they won’t have that option. Republicans who wish to put their name on Trump’s ouster will have to do it publicly, knowing all the potential costs associated with their defiance.

The lack of courage among so many Republicans to stand up to Trump on anything, from even the smallest policy disagreements to egregious moral and ethical failures, portends a fait accompli from the Republican Senate.

But what if a “coalition that could” decided they’d had enough — that this president has been a drag on their party and the country for too long, that the price of defending him wasn’t going to be worth it in the long term, that their own legacies were on the line? What would that look like?

Imagine it starting with just one. Larry Hogan Sr. was the first Republican to break with President Richard Nixon during his impeachment hearings, weakening not only the GOP firewall of support for the embattled president, but also Nixon’s own defiance.

There are a number of would-be Hogan candidates to watch: Utah Sen. Mitt Romney, one of the rare Republicans who managed to criticize Trump and still get himself elected, isn’t up for re-election until 2024, giving him perhaps the longest runway to make a principled stand and then wait out Trump’s wrath.

Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania aren’t up until 2022, giving both of them the opportunity to take their chances on a vote to remove without immediate political consequence.

Those may be the obvious potential defectors. But some believe the more impactful moves must come from less predictable places. As Lee Drutman has noted on FiveThirtyEight, “it’s rank-and-file Republican senators up for reelection in solidly red states, like Bill Cassidy from Louisiana or Jim Inhofe from Oklahoma, whom you should watch. If they waver, that will signal that Trump’s days are numbered.”

Of course, that’s asking a lot of senators who have done little to keep Trump in check up to this point.

There’s one final reason the Senate is not a foregone conclusion. We tend to think of the House as a less historically significant legislative body than the Senate. There are more representatives than there are senators, they’re up for reelection every two years, and many come and go without having much of an impact.

But for senators, the stakes are higher. Their votes and their actions aren’t written in pencil, but ink. It’s moments like these that can make or break a legacy forever. And if fewer than half of the Republican senators are mulling their own entries in the history books, it isn’t impossible to think that some could abandon the president to save themselves.

S.E. Cupp is the host of “S.E. Cupp Unfiltered” on CNN.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.