S.E. Cupp: Want activism with your coffee? | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

S.E. Cupp: Want activism with your coffee?

S.E. Cupp

How would you like your coffee — milk, sugar and a side of politics?

In an era when it seems impossible to divorce politics from everything else, Dunkin’ Brands, the parent company of Dunkin’ Donuts, is betting you might just appreciate a break whilst in their stores.

At an International Trademark Association meeting last month, Dunkin’s vice president of brand stewardship Drayton Martin told a room full of professors pointedly, “We are not Starbucks. We aren’t political. We don’t want to engage you in political conversation; we want to get you in and out of our store in seconds.” She also reportedly added, “We don’t want people burning their Munchkin boxes.”

This stands in refreshingly stark relief from the in-your-face political preaching of some other companies. And not just Starbucks, where former chairman/CEO and presidential might-run Howard Schultz waded heavily into politics. Starbucks named their stores “gun-free zones” and announced it will hire refugees in protest of President Trump’s immigration ban, and infamously launched an ill-fated campaign to have baristas confront unsuspecting customers about race after handing over their half-caf, no foam, skim mocha lattes.

In 2017, Pepsi apologized for a cringeworthy ad featuring model Kendall Jenner at a fictional Black Lives Matter protest, seeming to solve race relations by handing a police officer a soft drink; it managed to tick off multiple competing activist groups.

Corporate America’s path to wokeness has been littered with casualties, and Dunkin’ clearly wants to avoid becoming part of the carnage.

Others might be catching on.

A few weeks ago, ESPN president Jimmy Pitaro revealed in a Los Angeles Times interview, “Without question our data tells us our fans do not want us to cover politics,” marking a significant shift in coverage by the sports outlet, which had come under increasing scrutiny for foisting politics on unwitting sports fans.

But, as consumers of coffee, soft drinks and sports news draw a sigh of relief, it’s important not to confuse politics with social consciousness.

While the public might recoil at pushy politics, American consumers still believe corporate America should be socially aware. According to a Morning Consult poll from last year, 59% of Democrats and 55% of Republicans say a company’s stance on a social or political matter is important when it comes to buying a product or service.

When Nike released an ad supporting Black Lives Matter activist Colin Kaepernick, detractors burned their sneakers, and some states and cities even tried to ban the brand. But its stock surged by 5% in the three weeks after the ad debuted.

In the wake of Trump’s corporate tax cut, environmentally active clothing company Patagonia said it would take the money it was saving in taxes and put it “back into the planet.” Patagonia climbed from No. 9 to No. 3 on the 2019 Harris Poll Reputation Quotient, measuring the trust and reputation of the 100 most visible companies nominated by consumers.

Other brands on the list saw similar movement, including Dick’s Sporting Goods and IKEA, both of which earned top spots following their moves to restrict gun sales and address climate change, respectively. Chick-fil-A draws the ire of progressives for its opposition to same-sex marriage, but among Republicans it earned the No. 1 spot on the list.

It’s a fine line that proves difficult to navigate. The message to corporate America, entertainment media and even Hollywood isn’t that social issues shouldn’t matter — it’s that politics shouldn’t overtake the experience of watching sports, buying a cup of coffee or eating a hamburger.

S.E. Cupp is the host of “S.E. Cupp Unfiltered” on CNN.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.