S.E. Cupp: We’re all culpable in the culture of political hate | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

S.E. Cupp: We’re all culpable in the culture of political hate

S.E. Cupp
President Trump talks to reporters aboard Air Force One after visiting Dayton and El Paso Aug. 7.

It feels like we’re all actors on a movie set. In the face of yet another tragic and horrifying mass shooting — two, actually — it’s like the director yelled “Action!” and we all assumed our positions.

The responses to two hate-inspired shootings last weekend, one in El Paso, Texas, and another in Dayton, Ohio, have been nothing if not predictable.

Democratic lawmakers blame guns and the NRA, and have called on Republicans to pass more gun laws. And frankly, they should.

Republican lawmakers have, with a few notable exceptions, ignored those calls, instead tweeting out “thoughts and prayers” or blaming other societal ills like mental illness or violent video games.

Many in both parties blame President Trump for inciting violence and stoking anti-immigrant hate, and they have a point. He’s done next to nothing to temper the animosity and divisions boiling up in our everyday interactions. In fact, he’s exploited and fomented them to amass influence and try to get re-elected.

Another version is to blame Trump’s supporters. Rep. Joaquin Castro called out an El Paso barbecue joint and a local Realtor, among others, on Twitter, claiming they are responsible for “fueling a campaign of hate” through their political donations to Trump.

Naturally, the president is pointing his finger back at the left, specifically to Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and antifa, all of whom the Dayton shooter claims to have supported. As for the El Paso shooter, whose manifesto echoes Trump’s white nationalist language, Trump took no responsibility.

Inside the media, it’s more finger-pointing.

Media Matters president Angelo Carusone knows exactly who is responsible, saying there is a straight line from white supremacism “right through to Donald Trump and his campaign’s messaging and communications, and that line goes right through Fox News.”

Meanwhile, over at Fox News, one host claimed those very categorizations of the television network and its right-wing hosts are going to be responsible for more violence.

Where has any of this gotten us? Exactly, precisely nowhere. We’re no closer to solving any of our problems, bridging our political divisions, tackling racism, preventing more violence, passing new laws, becoming a better society.

Be wary of the people with the most definitive and narrow explanations for whom is to blame for these mass shootings. Anyone who feels as if they have the moral high ground in this equation isn’t being honest.

That includes me, and probably you. After all, who doesn’t believe their political views are the right ones, and their guys — in politics, on television, in life — are the good guys? You probably believe, whole-heartedly and without equivocation, that it’s the other side that is hate-filled, un-American, responsible for where we are today.

I’m not for a second suggesting these two disturbed shooters aren’t totally and singularly responsible for murdering innocent people in the name of hate. I am not equating those who want to kill people they view as enemies with people who just want to win arguments and expose what they deeply believe to be moral rot.

But we’ve all engaged in a politics of Us versus Them. And it’s that setup that helps keep us locked in a permanent cycle of hate, violent rhetoric and finger-pointing that fails to get at the root of our problems.

In the aftermath of these tragedies, it’s tempting to look outward, identify the big actors responsible and call for big changes. And it’s probably time for some. But it’s also important to look inward, and make some big changes in ourselves. We are all culpable in this culture of hate.

S.E. Cupp is the host of “S.E. Cupp Unfiltered” on CNN.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.