Tom Purcell: Bribing kids’ way into the ‘easy life’ robs them of true happiness | TribLIVE.com
Tom Purcell, Columnist

Tom Purcell: Bribing kids’ way into the ‘easy life’ robs them of true happiness

Tom Purcell
1026345_web1_874625-c0d1ed6c0bf54517ba272cdf41f830a9
In this Feb. 28, 2019 photo, actress Lori Loughlin (center) poses with daughters Olivia Jade Giannulli (left) and Isabella Rose Giannulli at the 2019 “An Unforgettable Evening” in Beverly Hills, Calif.

Boy, do I feel sorry for Lori Loughlin’s daughters.

It’s been all over the news that Loughlin and her husband allegedly paid $500,000 in bribes to get their two girls into the University of Southern California. The fellow they allegedly bribed is said to have helped them falsely identify the girls as USC crew recruits, helping them gain admission, even though neither girl had ever been part of a crew team.

Their story reminds me of a quote, source unknown, that has long stuck with me: “Surviving poverty is one thing, but surviving wealth?”

While much of the country cannot imagine having enough dough to be able to spend $500,000 to get their kids into an elite college, no small number of people do have such money to spend on such things. I feel sorry for parents who use their money to game the system for their kids, though they should know better — and even sorrier for their kids.

Because these parents are robbing their children of true happiness.

Consider: A study — conducted, ironically, at USC — found that money ultimately doesn’t make us happy.

Though it’s true that a lack of money causes stress and unhappiness, it’s also true that once people’s incomes enable them to meet their basic needs, with a little left over for some nice things like vacations, their happiness level does not increase further as their income soars further.

In other words, more stuff does not equal more happiness.

The USC researcher concluded that the more we have, the more we want, and so we end up working even harder to get even more — and have even less time to enjoy things that truly make us happy, such as good health and time with loved ones.

Status, big houses and crazy-expensive cars don’t make us happy, you see. Cheating your kids’ way into an elite university won’t do it, either. How can anyone ever feel good about “getting ahead” this way?

And being forever labeled as a cheat is surely a source of unhappiness — a label that has already cost Loughlin acting roles in Hallmark movies and one of her daughters a lucrative deal with a cosmetics company.

Lucky for me, my parents had limited financial means, but blessed me with massive wealth in many other ways.

For starters, they knew that if I were to be a successful, happy adult, I’d have to earn it through hard work and sacrifice — and failure.

Allowing their children to experience failure is one of the best gifts that parents can give them. Through failure, we learn what we’re not good at — and, eventually, where our true talents lie.

Sure, failure is a painful experience. But if we’re smart enough to learn from it, it’s a far better experience than the queasiness that shrouds our feelings when our “success” results from cheating.

Only when real success finally comes — only when we’re recognized for our hard work and for accomplishing things that are meaningful and benefit the world — can we enjoy true happiness.

Some Americans who have unimaginably vast financial resources are burdened with choices that those of lesser means will never confront. And some of those wealthy Americans, who really should know better, make poor choices that rob not just themselves, but also their children, of true accomplishment and real happiness.

And that’s why I feel so sorry for Lori Loughlin’s daughters.

Freelance writer Tom Purcell of Library is author of “Misadventures of a 1970s Childhood.” Visit him on the web at TomPurcell.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.