ShareThis Page
Tom Purcell

Desperate for tax reform that simplifies

| Saturday, Sept. 9, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
President Donald Trump gestures while speaking about tax reform last month at the Loren Cook Co. in Springfield, Mo. (AP Photo | Jeff Roberson)
President Donald Trump gestures while speaking about tax reform last month at the Loren Cook Co. in Springfield, Mo. (AP Photo | Jeff Roberson)

“Help!” said the fellow, surrounded by a pile of papers. “I don't think I'm going to make it through this 1040 tax form.”

“Why is that?” I said.

“The 2016 tax extension I filed is due by Oct. 15. But it is so complicated, I don't see how I can possibly figure it.”

“Millions feel your pain,” I said. “According to Forbes, the basic 1040 form was two simple pages in 1935. Now the basic 1040 form has 100 pages of instructions that are very complex. Maybe you can contact the Internal Revenue Service for help.”

“Ha!” he said. “The tax code has gotten so complicated that even the IRS can't get a handle on it. Every year, some group has 10 people call 10 IRS representatives with the same questions, and they frequently get several different answers.”

“That's no good.”

“Did you know that in 1913, when the income tax was introduced in America, it was only 1 percent, and only the very wealthy paid it?”

“I did not.”

“Well, taxes have a tendency to go one way and that is up,” he said. “During our wars, tax rates shot way up to pay for the war efforts and nobody complained, but the tax rates tended to stay high after the wars.”

“Well, we did a lot of things in America after the Second World War,” I said. “We built up our infrastructure, made money available for college and houses through the GI Bill and invested billions in social programs. These things cost dough.”

“Sure, that is well and good and these programs helped millions, but even as taxes increased, it wasn't until recent years that completing a stupid tax form got so difficult.”

“Please explain.”

“It's been 30 years since President Reagan ushered in tax simplification. At that time, multiple loopholes and deductions were eliminated in return for lower rates. In the late '80s, completing a 1040 was a piece of cake.”


“But over the years, Congress kept meddling with the tax code. Sometimes it was to pass targeted cuts for individuals and small businesses, which many welcomed. Other times it was to insert loopholes to pay back donors. The result is an incredible tax complexity that is hurting everyone.”

“How so?”

“Because the tax code is so difficult to comply with, average Joes and small-business folks have to hire accountants to file their returns. The Daily Signal reports that the tax code was 400 pages in 1913. Now it is more than 70,000 pages!”

“That's no good.”

“The Daily Signal further reports that ‘Americans spend 9 billion hours complying with the tax code every year, which costs them over $400 billion in lost economic productivity every year.' Tax complexity is a key reason economic growth has been stagnant in recent years.”

“What can we do to solve the problem?”

“We make Republicans in Congress honor their campaign promises and work with President Trump to lower rates, simplify filing and get rid of loopholes for special interests. We need a new tax code that unleashes the pent-up creativity and energy in our business sector — that makes it easier for people to risk their savings by investing in new businesses. That is how you create jobs, increase wages and put millions of people back into the middle class.”

“Your ideas are good, but it's taking Congress and the president way too much time to address the problem. In the meantime, why don't you just hire a highly skilled tax attorney to help you complete that 1040 extension?”

“That's the problem,” he said. “I AM a highly skilled tax attorney!”

Tom Purcell, a freelance writer, lives in Library. His books include “Misadventures of a 1970s Childhood” and “Wicked Is the Whiskey,” a Sean McClanahan mystery. Visit him on the web at Email him at:

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me