Wayne Campbell: Keep Sunday hunting ban | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

Wayne Campbell: Keep Sunday hunting ban

Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
A hunter scans the woods for a buck in Forbes State Forest during the first day of firearms season Nov. 26.

The issue of allowing Sunday hunting has surfaced again. Senate Bill 147 sponsored by Sen. Dan Laughlin, R-Erie, removing the prohibition, was reported out of the Senate Game and Fisheries Committee without benefit of public scrutiny or hearings.

It is unfortunate that opponents to Sunday hunting were not given a chance to present our case to the committee or meet with committee members prior to the vote. We hope that the full Senate will not rush to judgment but will take the time to consider several points.

The Pennsylvania Game Commission appears to be actively supporting an elimination of the restriction on Sunday hunting. Although it knows its purposes best, one reason is clearly financial. The commission is seeking additional revenues. I empathize, since the majority of its revenue comes from hunting license fees; it does not receive money from the General Fund.

In the fiscal year 2019-20 state budget, the Game Commission requests $98.84 million for general operations, a $6.172 million increase from its current budget. The budget document does not describe what the increased funding is for, saying only that the money would “continue present program.”

The additional resources would not be used to hire additional staff, since the staff level is 686 job slots in both the current and next fiscal years. . It is not apparent that the money would go toward additional enforcement of hunting laws, since the proposed budget says that the Game Commission estimates 6,725 violations of game laws in the new fiscal year, the same amount as the current fiscal year.

Here is the most telling statistic. The number of hunting licenses sold is decreasing. In 2013-14, 952,989 licenses were sold. This dropped to 885,564 in 2017-18. The Game Commission estimates the number for the current fiscal year (2018-19) at 867,853. For the proposed budget, the expected number of licenses sold would drop another 7,357.

That is a clear danger sign for the future of the Game Commission and to hunting in the commonwealth. As an avid hunter, I am deeply concerned. The decrease in hunting licenses sold is not just a fluke. The decline is longer-term.

What concerns me as much is that advocates for getting rid of the ban on Sunday hunting may think it is a panacea. They say that Sunday hunting will encourage more father-son hunting forays into the outdoors because Saturdays have been largely taken over by other youth sports. The suggestion is that more hunting licenses will be sold. To the Pennsylvania State Grange, this argument is insufficient.

A better approach would be to take a serious look at why fewer licenses are being sold. Is it a cultural shift away from hunting by millennials? Are guns getting a bad media rap, prompting some to choose other activities? Is the decline and almost elimination of gun safety classes through the schools a factor? After all, if kids are not exposed to the proper way to handle firearms, they may simply not be interested in hunting as sport or recreation. Are other states experiencing the same problem, or is the license decline Pennsylvania-specific?

Instead of eliminating the ban, hunting advocates should be taking a deeper look at preserving the future of hunting in Pennsylvania.

The Sunday prohibition came about for several reasons. One was the fear that Sunday hunting would erode family time or diminish the importance of religion in our society; however, reverence and family values still rank high with many Pennsylvanians. Another was the belief that people enjoying the recreational outdoors should have a day when the fear of being accidently shot doesn’t stop them from fully enjoying the outdoors.

The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, in an assessment and analysis of the outdoor recreation economy in the United Statescredited outdoor recreation for generating 2.2 percent of the gross domestic product in 2016. The top six outdoor recreation activities were boating/fishing, $36.9 billion; game areas such as golfing and tennis, $34.7 billion; RVing, $30 billion; guided tours/outfitted travel, $25.7 billion; and motorcycling/ATVing, $20.3 billion.

Well down the list came hunting, at $13.9 billion.

A non-governmental source, the Outdoor Industry Association, reported a higher number for U.S. retail spending than the government study, $27.4 billion. Humbling to myself as someone who believes in hunting was the revelation that wildlife watching has more of an economic impact than hunting ($30.2 billion vs. $27.4 billion), generated more jobs (235,825 vs.194,973 for hunting), and more state and local taxes ($1.9 billion vs. $1.7 billion).

Pennsylvania should preserve the ban on Sunday hunting and look for other ways to restore hunting’s rightful role in Pennsylvania.

Wayne Campbell is president of the Pennsylvania State Grange, an advocacy organization for farmers, families and businesses in Pennsylvania’s rural communities.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.