ShareThis Page
Local Opinion

Letter to the editor: Contact your legislators about climate change

| Thursday, Sept. 13, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

Many people feel overwhelmed by the enormity of the impact of climate change, with all the soaking rain and flooding we have seen locally, as well as reports that California and Scandinavia are on fire. Well, cheer up! Scientists have actually mapped out climate problems, and solutions are available now. All we have to do is support our local leaders in setting appropriate goals and putting these solutions to work.

Pittsburgh has already joined Philadelphia and Allentown in committing to a goal of 100 percent clean energy, but PennEnvironment is pushing the entire commonwealth to meet that goal by 2050 as well. That’s why I want to thank City Councilwoman Erika Strassburger, and state Reps. Ed Gainey, D-Lincoln-Lemington, and Adam Ravenstahl, D-Summer Hill, who showed up on Aug. 14 for PennEnvironment’s Clean Energy Champions Forum to support this effort.

Right now in the Pennsylvania Legislature, there are two bipartisan bills to set a goal for Pennsylvania to transition to 100 percent clean energy by 2050: House Bill 2132 and Senate Bill 1140. I felt so much better after I contacted state Rep. Anita Astorino Kulik, D-McKees Rocks, and state Sen. Wayne Fontana, D-Brookline, about this important issue. Please join me by contacting your state legislators and asking them to support these bills.

Mary Zuccaro

Carnegie

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me