ShareThis Page
Local Sports

Big 12 reprimands West Virginia's Bob Huggins for comments after loss to Kansas

| Thursday, Feb. 22, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

West Virginia coach Bob Huggins was reprimanded by the Big 12 on Thursday for comments he made about officiating after the Mountaineers' 77-69 loss at Kansas on Saturday.

“There are proper channels within the conference structure to handle officiating concerns,” Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby said in a release. “Coach Huggins' public comments are contrary to the conference's sportsmanship standards.”

Free-throw disparity was at the heart of Huggins' comments. Kansas attempted 35 free throws to the Mountaineers' two.

“I've been doing this for 40 years, and I don't think I've ever been in a game where we shot two free throws,” Huggins said after the game. “I don't think I've ever been in a game where the disparity was — (asks a reporter) what is it, you know what it is — 35-2.”

Huggins said he was miffed that points of emphasis discussed before the season weren't being called and also wondered why officials weren't available to speak to the media in a postgame session.

“You sit there at the beginning of the year and they tell you, ‘We're going to call this' and (say they are going to) put emphasis on stuff, then do it. Don't do it for a while and then stop, put your own spin on it and do it.

“Officials want to be part of the game, but they don't want to be part of the game that has to answer,” Huggins said. “Why aren't they in here answering your questions? We're going to bring 19, 20, 21-year-old kids in here who don't get paid, and you're going to ask them questions.”

Asked what he told his team after the game, Huggins said, “It wasn't their fault.”

In the game, West Virginia was called for 26 fouls and Kansas 14. The West Virginia bench received two technical fouls and Huggins was ejected with 8 seconds remaining.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me