ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Mark Cuban open to being vice president for either Trump or Clinton

| Sunday, May 22, 2016, 11:00 p.m.
Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban
Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban

Imagine: Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban one heartbeat away from the presidency.

The billionaire who also happens to have a reality show says he would listen if either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, the presumptive party nominees, approached him.

“Absolutely,” Cuban replied when Chuck Todd asked him about running with Clinton on Sunday's “Meet the Press.” “But the key would be she'd have to go more to the center. I like the fact that Senator Clinton has thought-out proposals. That's a good thing because at least we get to see exactly where she stands. But I think that Senator (Bernie) Sanders has dragged her too far to the left.”

Clinton's response?

“I think we should look widely and broadly. It's not just people in elected office. It is successful businesspeople,” the Democratic front-runner told Todd. “I am very interested in that, and I appreciate his openness to it.”

Cuban, who described himself as “fiercely independent,” called Trump a friend and said he would listen to him, too, about being on his ticket. However, he wants to press the likely Republican nominee for his position on specific issues.

“If he asked me, I'd be like, ‘OK, Donald. That's great. Let's talk about it. But we're both going to have to dig in and really look and understand the issues so we can come up with solutions.' ”

A week ago, the Mt. Lebanon native told The Washington Post that a group of conservative politicians had asked him to run as a third-party candidate.

“I don't see it happening,” Cuban wrote in an email.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me