ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Bannon 'strongly' believes Trump won New Hampshire in 2016

| Thursday, Nov. 9, 2017, 11:30 p.m.
Steve Bannon, the former chief strategist to President Donald Trump, speaks during an event in Manchester, N.H., Thursday, Nov. 9, 2017.
Steve Bannon, the former chief strategist to President Donald Trump, speaks during an event in Manchester, N.H., Thursday, Nov. 9, 2017.

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Former White House adviser Steve Bannon said Thursday he “strongly” believes Republican President Donald Trump won New Hampshire and that voter irregularities were behind his loss in the state in the 2016 presidential election.

“I believe strongly — and I'm prepared to put money where my mouth is — that we won the state of New Hampshire,” Bannon told a cheering crowd of about 200 at a Manchester fundraiser for the conservative group 603 Alliance.

Democrat Hillary Clinton won New Hampshire and all four of the state's electoral votes.

Trump has cited New Hampshire as part of his unsubstantiated claims that millions of people voted illegally in 2016. He created the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity in May to investigate those claims.

“The people of New Hampshire deserve to understand what happened on that day,” Bannon said. “I don't care if you are a Republican or a Democrat, a Clinton supporter or a Trump supporter, you can't play games with that.”

Bannon says his claims are supported by state data that shows that only 15 percent of the 6,540 voters who used out-of-state driver's licenses have since acquired New Hampshire licenses. But state law allows someone to be domiciled in New Hampshire for voting purposes and be a resident of another state for driver's licensing purposes — for example, students attending college in New Hampshire.

The data also was cited in September by Republican Kris Kobach, the vice chairman of the president's election integrity commission and Kansas secretary of state, as proof of fraud that likely led to Democratic U.S. Sen. Maggie Hassan's victory over Republican incumbent Kelly Ayotte last November. Democrats pounced on those comments, suggesting Kobach was misleading the public by using irrelevant data to rehash false claims.

Bannon spent much of his hourlong speech recounting Trump's election success and only made passing references to the big wins by Democrats in Tuesday's elections and to the controversy swirling around Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Bannon, who in the past has backed Moore, didn't directly comment on allegations first reported by The Washington Post against the Alabama candidate of sexual misconduct with minors going back decades. The allegations have prompted Republican party leaders to demand he get out of the race if the accusations prove true.

“The Bezos-Amazon-Washington Post that dropped that dime on Donald Trump, is the same Bezos-Amazon-Washington Post that dropped the dime this afternoon on Judge Roy Moore,” Bannon said. “Now is that a coincidence? That's what I mean when I say opposition party.”

As Bannon arrived at the Manchester event, he was greeted by more than 100 protesters who chanted, “no hate in the granite state” and held signs with slogans including, “Bannon go home.” Many questioned why Republicans were paying as much as $750 to hear Bannon's message.

“I'm here basically to send a message to Steve Bannon and all the people who attended tonight from the 603 Alliance that there isn't any room for hate in the granite state,” said protester David Meuse.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me