ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Trump takes credit for air safety system run by Obama holdover

| Tuesday, Jan. 2, 2018, 8:39 p.m.
President Donald Trump boards Air Force One in West Palm Beach, Florida with First Lady Melania Trump and son Barron Trump en route to Washington on Jan. 1,
AFP/Getty Images
President Donald Trump boards Air Force One in West Palm Beach, Florida with First Lady Melania Trump and son Barron Trump en route to Washington on Jan. 1,

WASHINGTON — President Trump is taking credit for the safety of the U.S. aviation system even though it is being run by a holdover from the previous administration and has avoided any commercial passenger fatalities for several years before he took office.

"Since taking office I have been very strict on Commercial Aviation," Trump said in a tweet Tuesday morning. "Good news - it was just reported that there were zero deaths in 2017, the best and safest year on record."

If by "commercial aviation" he means scheduled passenger airline flights, the record actually stretches back to July 2013, when an Asiana Airlines plane struck a seawall as it was about to land in San Francisco, killing three people. The last death on a U.S.-registered airline was in 2009 near Buffalo, N.Y.

Commercial aviation generally refers to paying customers on planes of all sorts. The National Transportation Safety Board reported at least 13 deaths last year in seven crashes involving commercial charter flights in the U.S.

Last year was unusual in one regard: There were no fatalities involving scheduled passenger jet airliners anywhere in the world, according to the Aviation Safety Network. But there were 10 airliner accidents resulting in 44 occupant fatalities and 35 deaths of people on the ground worldwide last year when charter and cargo planes were included.

This makes 2017 the safest year ever, both by the number of fatal accidents as well as in terms of deaths. In 2016, ASN recorded 16 accidents and 303 lives lost.

"I'm unaware that the president has had any impact on aviation oversight policy or practice," said Bob Mann, president of aviation consultancy R.W. Mann & Co. "Social media is not 'oversight.'

"In fact, his stated preferences — less 'red tape,' fewer regulations — would suggest a preference for less oversight, not strictness."

The trend toward safer flying has been building for years as U.S. regulators, the airlines and safety investigators brought on board new safety technologies, better monitoring of potential hazards and improved training.

Indeed, the head of the Federal Aviation Administration during the first year of the Trump administration Michael Huerta was appointed by former President Obama. Huerta's five-year term expires on Jan. 6.

Last year's aviation safety record is the culmination of decades of work by industry and governments worldwide and should be applauded as a success story, said John Cox, chief executive officer of consultant Safety Operating Systems and a former commercial airline pilot.

"It's a great thing but I don't think any one individual can take credit for it," Cox said. "As the head of the federal government, I suppose you can take credit for the very good work the FAA has done over the years, but it's the work the people in the trenches have done that has led to this result."

The FAA referred all questions to the White House.

"President Trump has raised the bar for our nation's aviation safety and security," Raj Shah, a White House spokesman, said. He cited anti-terrorism efforts and a plan to privatize air traffic control that has languished in Congress.

"The president is pleased there were no commercial airline deaths in 2017, and hopes this remains consistent in 2018 and beyond," Shah added.

Trump had harsh words for the FAA's air traffic control system last year during the debate over whether it should be privatized and spun off to a nonprofit. He cited a technology modernization program he said was not progressing fast enough.

"They didn't know what they were doing," he said of previous efforts to modernize the system. "A total waste of money."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me