ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Republicans favor Barletta for Senate in early straw polls

Wes Venteicher
| Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2018, 3:33 p.m.
Lou Barletta
Lou Barletta
Rep. Jim Christiana, R-Beaver County.
Rep. Jim Christiana, R-Beaver County.
Delaware County businessman Paul Addis
Facebook/Paul Addis
Delaware County businessman Paul Addis

U.S. Senate candidate Lou Barletta received 127 of 144 votes in a weekend round of GOP straw poll voting, with the remainder going to Jim Christiana, a state representative from Brighton.

GOP committees conducted the polls in the Central, Northeast and east-central regions of the state. Polls in the Southwest, Northwest and Southeast will be held Jan. 20 and Feb. 3. Barletta, of Hazleton, is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives.

“Today's votes are a clear indication that our campaign is gaining the momentum we need to defeat Sen. (Bob) Casey and send a strong message that Pennsylvania will be the top race in the country,” Barletta said in a statement. “While I am grateful for today's results, this is just the start. I look forward to earning the support of the remaining caucuses and continuing to unite the entire Pennsylvania Republican Party behind my campaign.”

The Pennsylvania Republican State Committee holds an endorsement vote Feb. 10, according to Barletta's campaign.

Christiana's campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Paul Addis, a retired Delaware County energy executive who is running, said the polls reflect the preference of party insiders, not necessarily voters.

“The party establishment in Pennsylvania would like Mr. Barletta to be the nominee, so it doesn't surprise me that people who traditionally respond to the party and work on behalf of the party, and that's where their main experience is, would support Mr. Barletta,” he said.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me