ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Lawmakers argue over memo redactions as they await Trump's decision on Democrats' rebuttal

| Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2018, 9:45 p.m.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., strides to a GOP conference joined at right by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., also a member of the Intelligence Committee, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2018.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., strides to a GOP conference joined at right by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., also a member of the Intelligence Committee, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2018.

WASHINGTON — Lawmakers are confident President Trump will allow the release of Democrats' rebuttal to a GOP memo alleging federal law enforcement abused its surveillance authority, and have begun arguing over which party should be blamed for redactions the government has yet to make.

Democrats have warned the president against scrubbing any more classified information from their document than what the FBI and Justice Department recommend, saying the context is necessary to refute the GOP's allegations. Their 10-page memo includes more classified information than the four-page GOP memo the House Intelligence Committee made fully public on Friday.

House Republicans say they suspect the Democrats of designing their memo to require so many redactions that they can later accuse Trump of muzzling their rebuttal for political purposes.

"You have to hand it to them; they set themselves up in a really great position," said Rep. K. Michael Conaway, R-Texas, who is running the House Intelligence Committee's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and whether any of Trump's associates coordinated with the Kremlin. "The other side will be able to say, 'Well something politically was redacted out of there,' and how do you prove that being wrong? Because it's stuff we can't tell people about."

Members of both parties acknowledge that at least some of the secret information in the Democrats' document must be blacked out before it can be released to the public, to protect intelligence sources and methods. On Tuesday, the intelligence committee's top Democrat, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., surmised that the Republicans' stating their concerns could be an effort to help the president make additional changes.

"I'm not surprised they would like things omitted from our response," he said.

Tuesday's dispute suggests the partisan sniping that began last month when Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee unveiled their memo will continue regardless of whether Trump decides to release the Democrats' rebuttal.

White House Chief of Staff John Kelly told reporters in the Capitol that he had given White House lawyers a deadline of "no later than Thursday" to complete their evaluation of the Democrats' memo so they could then recommend a course of action.

"This is not as clean a memo as the first one," Kelly said.

Trump met with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Tuesday to discuss the Democrats' rebuttal and how it differs from the GOP memo he approved last week without changes. The dueling memos both focus on an aspect of the Russia investigation that has divided the parties: a now-famous dossier alleging that Trump had personal and financial ties to Russia, and the extent to which the dossier influenced law enforcement's decision to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

The GOP memo suggests that the dossier's author, former British spy Christopher Steele, passed questionable information about Page to the FBI and Justice Department. The information is suspect, the GOP says, because Steele's work was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign — facts, they say, that were not disclosed to the court responsible for approving surveillance warrants.

Democrats defend the FBI's work and have disputed the dossier's overall importance in the warrant-approval process. The surveillance court was told that Steele could have political motivations, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

Schiff shared the Democrats' document with the FBI and the Justice Department last week, hoping to compare their recommendations against anything the White House may approve. He excoriated Nunes for refusing to more closely involve either agency in reviewing the GOP memo before its release.

Nunes has defended his decisions and actions, telling fellow Republicans on Tuesday that the truth is on the GOP's side, according to members in the room.

Republicans initially unconcerned by the Democrats' memo are increasingly worried the parties' disputes will worsen.

"I honestly think that most of it is fine ... but I've heard Schiff start to say that, you know, he's already anticipating [the White House] redacting a lot of stuff in it," said Rep. Thomas Rooney, R-Fla., who is helping Conaway to run the intelligence panel's Russia probe. "When he says stuff like that, you literally can't win. You're like in an abusive relationship."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me