ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Lawmaker seeks to question businessman in Mueller probe

| Thursday, March 8, 2018, 8:45 p.m.
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, arrives before his panel interviews former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, March 8, 2018. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Associated Press
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, arrives before his panel interviews former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, March 8, 2018. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

WASHINGTON — The top Democrat on the House intelligence committee said Thursday that he wants to question a Lebanese-American businessman who is cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California told reporters he would like George Nader to appear before the panel and for another witness, Erik Prince, to return for additional questioning to clear up seemingly inconsistent accounts about meetings last year in the Seychelles that also involved a Russian banker with ties to the Kremlin.

Nader was approached by law enforcement at an airport in January and has agreed to cooperate with Mueller's investigation, testifying last week before a grand jury Mueller has been using in Washington, according to a person with knowledge of the probe who was not authorized to discuss it on the record and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Among the things Mueller's office has been interested in hearing about from Nader are the January 2017 conversations in the Seychelles, an archipelago in the Indian Ocean.

The Washington Post reported Wednesday night that Mueller's office was told the Seychelles meetings were part of an attempt to establish a back channel between the Trump administration and the Kremlin. Prince, who founded the Blackwater private security firm, said in an interview with the House intelligence committee last year that there was no effort to set up a back channel and that he was not representing the Trump administration while in the Seychelles.

On Thursday, Schiff said he wanted the committee to hear from both men to “determine which account is accurate.”

“This has obviously been a recurrent issue during the investigation — whether there were meetings designed to set up secret back channels,” he said.

Meanwhile on Thursday, President Trump's former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski again refused to answer some questions as part of the House intelligence committee's Russia probe, becoming the latest in a string of witnesses to balk at some of the panel's inquiries.

Lewandowski's second visit to the panel ended after about three hours. Lewandowski appeared angry as he left the meeting, telling reporters as he walked out of the Capitol that his two interviews with the panel were “12 hours of my life I'll never get back.”

Minutes later, Schiff said that Lewandowski refused to answer questions about conversations he had with Trump or other White House officials after the day Trump was elected. Lewandowski was fired during the campaign, and has held no official positions in the White House. But he has talked frequently to Trump and others in his administration.

“Witnesses don't get to pick and choose when it comes to very relevant testimony to our investigation,” Schiff said.

Former White House adviser Steve Bannon and longtime Trump aide Hope Hicks also refused to answer some questions.

Democrats and Republicans on the committee have openly argued over their Russia investigation's scope and how long it should last. Republicans have been more lenient with witnesses and have said they want to wrap up the probe soon. Democrats have called for multiple subpoenas and say it is far from done.

The committee did issue a subpoena against Bannon in January after he refused to answer questions about the time after the election. Bannon returned to the committee and again refused to answer most questions, but it's unclear if the Republican House leadership will hold a vote on whether he should be held in contempt.

Hicks answered questions in an interview last week but declined to say anything about her time in the White House, saying she had been advised not to. Republicans did not issue a subpoena, despite Democratic requests.

Schiff said lawmakers had hoped to ask Lewandowski about the firing of former FBI Director James Comey and whether Trump talked to him about possibly firing special counsel Robert Mueller, among other things. Lewandowski and his lawyer said those questions were not “relevant,” Schiff said.

At his first interview in January, Lewandowski had a different response, that time saying he was not “prepared” to answer those questions. Republicans declined to issue a subpoena as they had with Bannon, but called him back a second time to question him again. Schiff said Thursday they should now subpoena Lewandowski, but Republicans haven't signaled whether they will do so.

The House panel is one of several congressional committees probing Russian meddling in the 2016 election and whether Trump's campaign was involved. The Senate judiciary and intelligence panels are also investigating.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me