ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Proposal in Harrisburg takes aim at 'puppy mills'

| Wednesday, March 21, 2018, 1:21 p.m.
Three surviving puppies, photographed in 2016, were found abandoned in Uniontown.
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Three surviving puppies, photographed in 2016, were found abandoned in Uniontown.

Two Western Pennsylvania state lawmakers are proposing legislation to try to prevent pet stores from selling animals from commercial breeding facilities known as “puppy mills.”

The proposal would limit pet stores to selling dogs, cats and rabbits only from shelters and rescues, according to memos for twin bills introduced in the state House and Senate.

“It is well documented that ‘puppy mills,' inhumane commercial dog-breeding facilities, frequently supply pet stores with puppies,” according to the proposal. “Consumers often spend thousands of dollars caring for sick puppies from pet stores, in some cases only to suffer the heartbreak of their new pet dying. With this legislation, pet stores will partner with shelters and rescues to promote adoption and decrease the demand for the puppies raised in puppy mills.”

State Sen. Guy Reschenthaler, R-Jefferson Hills, and Rep. Jason Ortitay, R-Bridgeville, each introduced the proposal.

Legislation also would remove an exemption in state law that lets licensed kennels sell dogs at public places in the state, according to the proposal. And it would require licensed kennels to include their license number in advertisements, which the sponsors say would help potential buyers differentiate between licensed and unlicensed kennels.

The Humane Society, which included 12 Pennsylvania kennels on its “ Horrible Hundred ” list of puppy mills in 2017, is backing the proposals, according to PennLive .

Just one state — California — has passed a similar law, but more than 250 localities in the country have approved similar protections, according to the proposal.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676, or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me