ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

57th House District: Nelson wins 2nd full term

| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, 12:03 a.m.
57th Pennsylvania House of Representatives District: Collin Warren, Democrat. Eric Nelson, Republican.
57th Pennsylvania House of Representatives District: Collin Warren, Democrat. Eric Nelson, Republican.
State Rep. Eric Nelson, R-Hempfield
State Rep. Eric Nelson, R-Hempfield
Collin Warren, candidate for state House of Representatives in the 57th District.
Collin Warren, candidate for state House of Representatives in the 57th District.

Republican Eric Nelson won re-election on Tuesday to serve his second full term in the state House of Representatives.

Nelson, 49, of Hempfield, defeated Democratic political newcomer Collin Warren to represent the 57th House district that includes Greensburg, South Greensburg, Southwest Greensburg, Youngwood, Delmont, Hunker, New Stanton, Salem and parts of Hempfield.

With 49 of 51 precincts reporting, Nelson received 62 percent of the vote to Warren’s 37 percent. Results are unofficial until certified by the Westmoreland County Election Bureau.

“I’m just excited the people of our district chose me to represent them again,” Nelson said. “The strong bipartisan support shows that in our area people want somebody to listen to them.”

Nelson took office during a special election in March 2016 to serve out the remaining months of the term of former state Rep. Tim Krieger, who resigned at the end of 2015 after being voted to serve as a common pleas court judge. Nelson won a full two-year term later in 2016.

Nelson this fall said he wanted to protect taxpayers, improve economic development and ensure the personal liberty of all citizens. He said he favored more transparency in Harrisburg and pushed to help create jobs and attract new business to the region.

Warren, 25, of Southwest Greensburg, works as a debt settlement analyst. His campaign focused on health care and improving the local economy.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me