ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

'The year of gun safety'? Takeaways on gun control from Tuesday's election results

| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, 7:36 p.m.
Police stand guard outside the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh where a shooter opened fire Saturday, Oct. 27, 2018. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)
Police stand guard outside the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh where a shooter opened fire Saturday, Oct. 27, 2018. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

PHILADELPHIA — After Pittsburgh and Parkland, Las Vegas and Sutherland Springs, gun control supporters approached Tuesday’s midterm election with what they said was more momentum than ever, expecting national frustration with mass shootings to help buoy some candidates to victory.

And on Wednesday, their optimism appeared to be largely affirmed, with victories by gun control candidates in many of the congressional and gubernatorial races supporters viewed as referenda on the issue, in states including Pennsylvania, Virginia and Nevada. But gun rights supporters touted their own successes, including two U.S. Senate contests and state-level elections in Arkansas, Idaho and Oklahoma.

The changing tides of the historic, divisive midterm were enough to bring “a gun-sense majority … elected to the U.S. House,” said Brynne Craig, political director of Everytown for Gun Safety. That majority is largely aligned with the new Democratic House majority, and gun control advocates said predictions based on polling, ad spending and activism that gun control would motivate voters were proved correct Tuesday. According to one exit poll by NBC News, most voters said they support stricter gun laws, with one in 10 naming it as the country’s most important issue.

Some key races in Pennsylvania:

Several candidates backed by gun control groups won congressional elections, including Democrats Chrissy Houlahan in the 6th District, Susan Wild in the 7th, and Conor Lamb in the 17th. Houlahan and Lamb, both veterans, had strong backing from the groups and from VoteVets, which teamed up with former Rep. Gabby Giffords’ organization to promote “gun-sense” candidates. Democrats Madeleine Dean in the 4th and Mary Gay Scanlon in the 5th also won.

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, a key Republican ally of gun control advocates, won re-election in the 1st District. He was one of the few Republicans to receive endorsements from organizations such as Giffords’ group and Everytown.

Rep. Scott Perry, a Republican and a staunch gun rights supporter, won his Dauphin County re-election against Democrat George Scott, a gun control advocate.

Some key races nationwide:

A major victory for gun control advocates was the win by Democrat Jennifer Wexton in Virginia’s 10th District. Wexton toppled Rep. Barbara Comstock, a Republican backed by the National Rifle Association.

Democrat Lucy McBath, whose black teenage son was fatally shot in 2012, ran for Congress in Georgia’s 6th District in a bid to reduce gun violence. She declared victory Wednesday afternoon with a slim lead over Rep. Karen Handel, but the race had not been called.

Washington state widely approved a ballot initiative set to make firearm laws there some of the strictest in the country. It was the only state with a firearm-regulation measure on the ballot.

In Nevada, Democrat Steve Sisolak claimed the governorship, defeating pro-gun rights Gov. Brian Sandoval, in a state that had the biggest mass shooting in modern U.S. history just over a year ago.

The NRA made gains as the Republicans maintained control of the Senate, with major wins for Marsha Blackburn in Tennessee and Josh Hawley in Missouri.

In Kentucky, Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican with an A-rating by the NRA, kept his seat, fending off veteran Amy McGrath, who had generated buzz from gun control groups and other progressive organizations.

Now, supporters of gun control hope to pass a background-check bill in the House in 2019, which Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the House minority leader, had said would be a top priority if Democrats took the House.

“What we now know for sure is this: The intensity gap on guns has closed. Americans voting with gun violence in mind are voting for gun safety,” said Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, the grassroots arm of Everytown. “The 2018 election outcomes have marked a new world order. Lawmakers will have to start proving that they’re acting to stop gun violence in order to keep their jobs.”

Gun rights supporters, meanwhile, will seek to block votes on bills they view as threatening their freedom or the gun industry.

“You are the most powerful force in American politics, and we will never stop fighting against the anti-gun elitists bent on destroying our Second Amendment freedoms,” the NRA tweeted to its members early Wednesday morning.

Gun control advocates have a list of proposals they’d like Congress to vote on in the next session — measures that the GOP leadership has blocked. Proponents hope a passage of a background-check bill in the House would put significant pressure on the Senate to vote, although that remains unlikely in the Republican-controlled chamber.

Advocates say they also plan to focus on state legislatures, where they hope to pass bills such as one approved last month in Pennsylvania imposing gun restrictions on domestic abusers.

“2018 was, among other things, the year of gun safety,” said John Feinblatt, Everytown’s president.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me