ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Senate resolution would fault Saudi prince for Khashoggi death

| Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2018, 8:21 p.m.
Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., arrives for a closed-door meeting Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2018, on Capitol Hill on the slaying of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., arrives for a closed-door meeting Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2018, on Capitol Hill on the slaying of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — Six U.S. senators introduced a nonbinding resolution Wednesday that asserts Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was complicit in the murder of columnist Jamal Khashoggi, as senators try to reach agreement on a stronger bipartisan response.

The proposed resolution says Prince Mohammed was in control of security forces at the time of Khashoggi’s murder and that the Senate has “a high level of confidence” that the prince was complicit in the killing. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is the leading sponsor of the measure.

In addition, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker said senators will meet Thursday morning to see if they can agree on a proposal for sanctions against Saudi Arabia. Such a move probably would be attached to a resolution that would restrict U.S. support for the Saudi-led military campaign in Yemen, which Corker said he suspects will pass the Senate.

“At a minimum, just reading the crystal ball, that’s going to have support,” said Corker, R-Tenn. “So is there something that we can put on top of that that can get more votes?”

A group of senators received a classified briefing Tuesday from CIA Director Gina Haspel that they said convinced them that Prince Mohammed played a role in Khashoggi’s killing and dismemberment. Graham described the evidence as “a smoking saw.”

Graham, who is influential on foreign policy issues and has lately been an ally of President Donald Trump, told reporters earlier Wednesday he wants to “suspend arms sales and support for the war in Yemen until several things happen.” He added, “One of them would be holding those accountable for Mr. Khashoggi’s murder.”

The bipartisan resolution seeks to hold the crown prince accountable for “the abhorrent and unjustified murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi” as well as the humanitarian crisis in Yemen, preventing a resolution to the Saudi-led blockade of Qatar and the jailing and torturing of dissidents inside Saudi Arabia.

Also sponsoring the resolution are GOP Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida and Todd Young of Indiana, and Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein of California, Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Chris Coons of Delaware.

Graham has said the resolution would be followed by an effort to impose sanctions. He said Wednesday he can’t imagine the U.S. having a normal relationship with a Saudi Arabia run by the crown prince.

“It’s really dangerous for America to look away here,” Graham said. “I think you’re naive to believe you can excuse this and it will work out.”

Corker has said he expects votes on amendments to the Yemen war powers resolution on Monday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me